The Penalty for Good Looks in Western Australia

Reasoned Response to the Article: $120,000 - The Penalty for Good Looks in the Adelaide Advertiser. The westbound Australian Full Courts decision to award a lessen compensation to Widow, Mrs Teresa de sales, because of good looks is completely legal. But is it effective? This practice of fairness was passed in 1863, when women did not eat ofttimes in the counselling of an independent income, when they were dependent on their husbands for forage and shelter. This natural law utter that as beautiful widows had a higher(prenominal) likelihood of acquiring remarried and thereby arrive at a more than stable monetary status than plain women, they did not desire a full(a) compensation. Back then this was a useful law - load-bearing(a) those women who were not as likely to re marry - but now, creation more independent than in the past, they can postulate whether to marry or not. A beautiful muliebrity whitethorn not want to abbreviate married again, but because of thi s law, they would halt to conk with less compensation than a plain woman who may or may not want to get remarried. This law, which traveled into the Australian legal system from Eng earthly concern, has been repealed from the English statutory dodging since 1971. Australia should repeal the law too.

In a land where everyone is verbalize to be equal, there should not be a law discriminating between one womans face and anothers. Mrs de Sales verbalize ...It shouldnt matter if I had four arms and gallant muscae volitantes; a someone should still get 100 per penny of their payout. What Mrs de Sales meant was t hat every women, plain and beautiful, are eq! ual and they should all, therefore, be compensated the same. To more accurately state her point, Mrs de Sales should have said: ...It shouldnt matter if I was the most beautiful psyche in... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper