A Textual Analysis and Response to: In Memory of Zoe Yalland and Tortoise

Both poesys represent woe in the twentieth century, albeit different types. Both be also compose in blank shell verse. This allows the agent to write using a precise flexible spring not being hampered in the expression of thought or syntactical structure by the need to rhyme.The title In retrospect of Zo Yalland is stating all the way that this is a memorial to the lady however, this does not mean that it is an obituary. Although it is written after(prenominal) her death I dont necessarily see it as an obituary, rather more of an epitaph, and a bitter one at that. Obituaries are generally very generous in their remembrance of the deceased. They usually follow their purport and the contributions they made to it, paint a pretty picture of how love they were and how gloomyly missed theyll be. This poem is in all contrary to the norm as regard to obituaries. I see this written on a tomb, as if to say, Look Here lays a young wo universe, who during her life suffered a enor mous deal. Go live your life to the full, savour each moment, love those somewhat you, for you know not what tomorrow brings.Tortoise is a different title altogether. It is written in the same context as the verse, ambiguously and metaphorically. Initially you consider that the verse is literally to the highest degree a tortoise, until you come to realise that the power is using a clever play on words. As you necessitate on you find yourself analysing the text, struggling to understand what the author is trying to say, which is totally contrary to In memory of Zo Yalland. While Zos poem is groovy talking and to the point, Tortoise is ambiguousZos poem is weighed down with mental and somatogenetic anguish, the torturing of mind and body. It represents the deals of every solar day life against society and disease. The text utilise is very harsh, no frills, the author has told it equal it is. This is a poem that could be written for so many and yet I feel that this is indivi dual(prenominal) to the author. I mean Zo was close to him and he is airing his anger and thwarting at the waste of such a young life. Zo was clearly a person who never found true happiness. It evokes pathos, I felt kinda disturbed when I read this.Also you can read digest July at the multipleTortoise, I feel portrays the story of a soldiers ugly. This is the suffering of a tormented soul, the very suffering of ones spirit. Here is a man who has fought wars, seen comrades suffer and die, and is left but a shell of his former self. He has shut himself away from the world, for its grievances are nothing compared to what he has seen and experienced. He walks around like you or I and yet in his look his upheaval is clearly visible. Nothing is important to him anymore he wanders day to day, questioning nothing, existing, and drifting like a forgotten spirit. This poem is brimful with bathos. It made me feel melancholy.Zos poem is quite angrily written. on that point are underto nes of bitterness and regret, maybe these are emotions felt by the author for his subject. Words such as dog shit and nothing through with(p) show the harshness of the authors feelings towards her situation. His tone through break is dark and regretful, with a hint of unfairness he knew an awful lot about her life. It paints a very bleak picture of a young, hopeful, yet very sad life that never quite came up to her expectations. I believe the author is trying to say that we should all care a particular more about those around us, to free-spoken our eyes and see the realism of life, and to live each day as if it were our last. He is trying to suffer the cruelty and unfairness of the world.At first glance the reader of the Tortoise could be totally baffled by the text in this one. It definitely requires get ahead scrutiny to try and understand what the author is trying to say. The text is much more gentle and simple, yet more difficult to understand referable to the ambiguit y. I believe only the author truly knows the meaning rump Tortoise, it is left up to the reader to interpret it in their own way. perhaps this was the intention. While Zos poem is quite clear to understand Tortoise is open to many interpretations.The text in In Memory of Zoe Yalland is very negative. For guinea pig no space, no sun, nothing done, incase in, dragged down and not true. There is also text, which indicates the struggle in her life such as battling, hoping luck could run out more like praying, that with time just now staying meant starting to belong. As you read the text in the first verse it draws you into the emotional turmoil that she is experiencing, you are able, quite easily, to relate to her suffering. In the second verse I felt the emotion the author was displaying. He was unmistakably hurting not only at the loss of this woman, but also at the ridiculous hand fate had cruelly dealt her. His words were cutting, as if to shock the reader into recognising th e reality of this awful situation.Read alsoCase 302 July in MultiplexThe text of Tortoise in comparison to Zo is quite positive, although in a sad way. So he became a sort of miraculous stone suggests that as yet though he was struggling he overcame his problems and adjusted, even after he had everything shot away. Everything about the poem suggests a gentle abjure to lifes difficulties. You see? is almost like saying, oh well phrases like no question either, no reason to hurry and life is simple, are all positive, but in the context of the poem its as if he has given up, and so, life is no continuing difficult. He cant change what has happened, so he just lives with it, inside his shell.In conclusion I found In Memory of Zo Yalland to be a very negative poem with harsh realities and no hope, while Tortoise was more positive and hopeful, although it still cleverly portrayed suffering using a clever use of language. While In Memory of Zo Yalland bore pathos, Tortoise contained bat hos. These were two poems both displaying suffering but in entirely different ways.