Political Philosophy Essay -- essays research papers fc

Every country in the world has a government that regulates laws to grip order and peace. Not every(prenominal) government quite a little be just in its reigning, yet what defines a just ruling? And does anyone truly knowledge the right to control others? passim time antithetical types of governments shit been established. As history progressed most governments were overthrown because of the laws that were imposed. Emperors and Kings changed to Presidents and tiptop Ministers. This was caused by revolutions because the nation did not like the way they were being rule. exclusively should bulk be ruled in the outgrowth place? Who should have the right to do such a thing? Today, the most reigning countries ar protract by democracy. But what is its aspire? It is supposed to bring out the bequeath of the majority. So this means that someone forget unceasingly be unhappy. political philosophy deals with these sort of issues. bang-up minds such as Plato, Aristotle, Voltaire and Locke have looked at these issues and have tried to find the best executable answers. In age of old, kings created laws in order to keep peace. Most of the laws were exercise for selfish reasons. As history progressed nation felt that they were being ruled unfairly. So should laws as yet exist if there will always be someone who is receiving the short circuit end of the stick? Is it not the purpose, of laws and rights, to help people live in a safe environment? This is the main purpose of laws to keep order. The governments that we have today have so many laws because they keep trying to earn problems by creating more and more laws. There atomic number 18 even laws for creating laws. However, although they are supposed to be in the best amuse of the people, laws limit their let offhanded will. Laws tell a person what they can or cannot do. Unfortunately, they are unflustered essential because they keep most citizens safe. So therefore, set laws, although es sential, limit the free will of people no matter how innovative or unionised they are. To support this, the theories and opinions of John Locke, Hobbes, Voltaire, and Plato will be presented. The first three of these philosophers lived at approximately the same time period and altogether support the essentialness of laws, although they limit free will. Plato lived much earlier but still has his own views on government and how it should be run. This paper will use their theories o... ...en in Platos unusual utopian society where the philosophers are the government. The main estimation that can be derived from these philosophers is that laws are essential because they make out the lives of the citizens much safer and prosperous. It allows people to enjoy life rather than constantly think of their backs. The citizens give up a little of their free will in order to make another part of it.BibliographyAlistair Edwards and Jules Townshed. Interpreting Modern semipolitical schoo l of thought From Machiavelli to Marx. upstart York Palgrave MacMillian, 2002.Dudley Knowles. semipolitical ism. Montreal McGill- Queens University Press, 2001.John Gray. Voltaire The Great Philosophers. New York Routledge, 1999.Johann P. Sommerville. doubting Thomas Hobbes semipolitical Ideas in Historical Context. Palgrave Macmillian, 1992.Jonathan Wolff. An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 1996.Michael J. White. Political Philosophy A Historical Introduction. Oneworld Publications, 2004.Nicholas Jolley. Locke His Philosophical Thought. Oxford University Press, 1999.Paul G. Paquette and Laura Gini- Newman. Philosophy Questions and Theory. McGraw- Hill Ryerson, 2003.. Political Philosophy Essay -- essays research papers fc Every country in the world has a government that sets laws to keep order and peace. Not every government can be just in its ruling, but what defines a just ruling? And does anyone truly have the right to control others? Throughout time different types of governments have been established. As history progressed most governments were overthrown because of the laws that were imposed. Emperors and Kings changed to Presidents and Prime Ministers. This was caused by revolutions because the people did not like the way they were being ruled. But should people be ruled in the first place? Who should have the right to do such a thing? Today, the most powerful countries are run by democracy. But what is its purpose? It is supposed to carry out the will of the majority. So this means that someone will always be unhappy. Political philosophy deals with these sort of issues. Great minds such as Plato, Aristotle, Voltaire and Locke have looked at these issues and have tried to find the best possible answers. In days of old, kings created laws in order to keep peace. Most of the laws were set for selfish reasons. As history progressed people felt that they were being ruled unfairly. So should laws even exi st if there will always be someone who is receiving the short end of the stick? Is it not the purpose, of laws and rights, to help people live in a safe environment? This is the main purpose of laws to keep order. The governments that we have today have so many laws because they keep trying to solve problems by creating more and more laws. There are even laws for creating laws. However, although they are supposed to be in the best interest of the people, laws limit their free will. Laws tell a person what they can or cannot do. Unfortunately, they are still essential because they keep most citizens safe. So therefore, set laws, although essential, limit the free will of people no matter how sophisticated or organized they are. To support this, the theories and opinions of John Locke, Hobbes, Voltaire, and Plato will be presented. The first three of these philosophers lived at approximately the same time period and all support the essentiality of laws, although they limit free will. Plato lived much earlier but still has his own views on government and how it should be run. This paper will use their theories o... ...en in Platos unusual utopian society where the philosophers are the government. The main idea that can be derived from these philosophers is that laws are essential because they make the lives of the citizens much safer and prosperous. It allows people to enjoy life rather than constantly watch their backs. The citizens give up a little of their free will in order to exercise another part of it.BibliographyAlistair Edwards and Jules Townshed. Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy From Machiavelli to Marx. New York Palgrave MacMillian, 2002.Dudley Knowles. Political Philosophy. Montreal McGill- Queens University Press, 2001.John Gray. Voltaire The Great Philosophers. New York Routledge, 1999.Johann P. Sommerville. Thomas Hobbes Political Ideas in Historical Context. Palgrave Macmillian, 1992.Jonathan Wolff. An Introduction to Political Philosophy . Oxford University Press, 1996.Michael J. White. Political Philosophy A Historical Introduction. Oneworld Publications, 2004.Nicholas Jolley. Locke His Philosophical Thought. Oxford University Press, 1999.Paul G. Paquette and Laura Gini- Newman. Philosophy Questions and Theory. McGraw- Hill Ryerson, 2003..